Not silence — actual reluctance. How to tell the difference between a negotiating position, an unspoken objection, and a deal you should walk away from.
There is a difference between a client who has not signed and a client who will not. The first is an administrative problem that a reminder usually solves. The second is something else, and treating it as the first is how people end up sending a seventh follow-up to somebody who has already decided.
The tell is engagement. Silence after sending is usually an inbox problem. But a client who is replying, agreeing the work is going ahead, and still not signing is telling you something. The job is working out what.
The most common and the most fixable. A clause bothers them and they have not said so — often because raising it feels like a bigger deal than it is, or because they want to check with someone first.
The usual suspects are payment terms, liability caps, IP ownership, termination notice, and anything about exclusivity. These are negotiable, and the fact that they are in your template does not make them sacred.
Ask directly: "Is there a clause you would like to talk through?" It converts a stalemate into a negotiation, and a negotiation is a process with an end.
Your contact is enthusiastic, genuinely wants the work to happen, and does not have the authority. They may not want to say so.
Signs: vague timelines ("hoping to get this sorted this month"), passive phrasing ("it is with the team"), or enthusiasm that never converts to action.
The question that unlocks it is deliberately face-saving: "Is there anyone else who needs to review this before it can be signed?" It gives them a way to name the approver without admitting they are not one. Once you know who that is, you can make their life easier — a one-page summary of scope, price and term is usually what an approver actually wants, rather than the full contract.
They agreed verbally, then saw the total in writing and it landed differently.
This one is worth taking seriously rather than immediately discounting. A price that feels wrong in writing usually means the value was not established well enough beforehand, and discounting confirms that the first number was invented. Better to ask what changed, and to restate the value.
If you do move, move something other than the price. Reduce scope, extend the timeline, change the payment schedule. A smaller number for the same work teaches the client that your prices are opening positions.
A budget froze. The sponsor left. A reorganisation landed. None of this is about you, and none of it is recoverable by persistence.
The right move is to make it easy to say so. "Has anything changed at your end? Happy to park this and pick it up next quarter." That sentence recovers more future work than any amount of chasing, because it costs the client nothing to accept and leaves the relationship intact.
They have decided against and are avoiding the conversation. Extremely common, because most people find saying no to someone they like genuinely unpleasant.
The kindest and most efficient response is to give them permission. "If the timing is not right, just say — it will not cause any offence." A surprising number of people take that offer immediately, and you get your answer in a day rather than a month.
If you only ask one thing, ask this: "What would need to be true for this to go ahead?"
It is not a closing technique. It is a diagnostic. The answer tells you which of the five reasons you are dealing with, because a clause problem, an approval problem, a price problem and a dead deal all produce completely different responses to it.
And if the answer is a long silence, that is an answer too.
Decide in advance how long a deal stays open. Three weeks of active engagement with no signature is a reasonable ceiling for most services work.
Two reasons. First, your time is finite, and an hour spent on a deal that will not close is an hour not spent on one that would. Second, a pipeline full of maybes gives you a badly wrong picture of your own business — and you make decisions about hiring, marketing and cash on that picture.
An expiry date on the document does this for you without a difficult conversation. When it passes, the deal closes itself, and if the client comes back afterwards, that is a fresh conversation rather than an embarrassing resurrection.
When you do give up, mark it lost and write down why. Not for reporting — nobody with five deals needs a report — but because the reasons accumulate into something useful.
Three deals lost to price in a quarter is a positioning problem. Three lost to "no authority" is a qualification problem: you are talking to the wrong person too far into the process. Three lost to changed circumstances is bad luck. Those are three completely different things to fix, and you can only tell them apart if you wrote the reason down at the time.
The deals that hurt most are not the ones you lost. They are the ones that stayed open for four months and then evaporated, and you never found out which of the five reasons it was.
DraftYourBid learns from your winning proposals and generates tailored bids in minutes — in your voice, not a template.
Create your free account →